Skip to main content

Being Clear About The Gospel - Galatians 2:1 - 21

 Tuesday, August 11 –

It’s Tuesday in our reading thru the New Testament.  We are reading through the book of Galatians and will be done by the weekend.  Today we read Galatians 2:1 – 21.  After you’ve finished with the text, I invite you to come back here to gain some more benefit from your reading.


Paul had plenty of detractors.  Even though the Council in Jerusalem (Acts 15) had ruled that there would be nothing more added to faith in Christ for the Gentiles, many of the Jewish believers didn’t like it.  They were ready to receive Christ Jesus as the Messiah, but they were not prepared to be in a Gentile/Jewish church.  Paul had spent a great deal of time defending the singularity of the Gospel message – that believing in Jesus Christ is an act of God’s Grace and the gift of Faith he gives to us.  Then he reminds them that he received the Gospel as a direct revelation from Jesus Christ.  Thus, there is no other Gospel.  To make sure no one could say he invented it or received it from someone else, he recounts his conversion, then his call by God to be an Apostle, and his subsequent years away from Jerusalem.  Now in chapter two, he continues to make a case for how he received the Gospel message and what it meant to him in terms of dealing with both Jews and Gentiles.

After fourteen years, and the first missionary journey completed, Paul, Barnabas, and Titus – who was a Gentile convert – went to Jerusalem to stand in front of a council of leaders.  He had lived for almost ten years first in Tarsus, his home town, and then in Antioch, where he had gone at the request of Barnabas to help the young church (Acts 11:25-26).  Remember, it was the Apostle Peter who had received the revelation about the inclusion of the Gentiles into the faith of the Gospel (Acts 10), and not Paul.  Paul witnessed the Gentile converts for the first time in Antioch.  It was a visit by a prophet, and a revelation by God to Paul, that caused Barnabas and Paul to return to Jerusalem – “Now at this time some prophets came down from Jerusalem to Antioch. One of them named Agabus stood up and began to indicate by the Spirit that there would certainly be a great famine all over the world. And this took place in the reign of Claudius. And in the proportion that any of the disciples had means, each of them determined to send a contribution for the relief of the brethren living in Judea. And this they did, sending it in charge of Barnabas and Saul to the elders” (Acts 11:27-30). 

Paul uses this as a reference point to continue the narration concerning the source of the Gospel – “Then after fourteen years, I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, taking Titus along with me.  I went up because of a revelation and set before them (though privately before those who seemed influential) the gospel that I proclaim among the Gentiles, in order to make sure I was not running or had not run in vain.  But even Titus, who was with me, was not forced to be circumcised, though he was a Greek” (2:1-3).  Then in 2:4 – 10, Paul confirms that the leaders in Jerusalem fully supported both the work they were doing and the message they were proclaiming.  They “gave the right hand of fellowship to Barnabas and me, that we should go to the Gentiles...” (2:9b).  Yet he also makes it clear, certain people were “false brothers...who spied on Paul and the Gentiles, that they might bring them into slavery – to them, we did not yield in submission even for a moment so that the truth of the Gospel might be preserved for you” (2:4-5).  These “false brothers” knew the decision of the Council in Jerusalem, but they didn’t accept it, and therefore, sought to undermine it.  Grace is the means by which a person comes to faith in Jesus Christ.  They wanted to add layers of works, chiefly in circumcision, but also concerning dietary laws and festivals.  If they had succeeded, the Gospel would be reduced to a re-worked version of the Old Covenant and not a New Covenant.

Paul recalls Peter’s visit to Antioch, and how Peter had hypocritically first eaten with Gentiles, and then later, when other Jewish leaders arrived, separated himself – “fearing the circumcision party” (2:13). It was peer pressure, pure and simple, that caused Peter to withdraw.  He didn’t want to get into an argument with these so-called brothers, and he didn’t want to defend the need to embrace the Gentiles as part of the church.  This incident that followed created no small problem, for it had to do with whether the Gospel was to be understood as truth for the entire church, or only a small sect of it.    Paul rebuked Peter for acting differently from the faith he had affirmed in Jerusalem.  Peter may be a church leader – an Apostle no less – but neither he, nor even a supposed angel (1:8), may change the message of the Gospel.  It is not Paul’s Gospel, and it is not Peter’s Gospel, and it is not Jerusalem’s Gospel – it is God’s Gospel. 

No one likes looking in at family disputes, but this encounter and rebuke of Peter is a foundational issue of what happens when a person comes to faith in Christ.  Peter’s actions were directly counter to the truth of the doctrine.  The principle is – for me – very significant.  As a Pastor, who is charged with preaching the Gospel, and proclaiming the word of God, there is no compromise with any other teaching.  The Gospel is right for every person, for all cultures, and all ages.  If Paul had not acted, publicly no less, the church would have divided and split in two – a Jewish Christian church and a Gentile Christian church, and we can be sure, neither side would have accepted the other.  Paul’s response is startling, given Peter’s status, but his opposition to Peter was both “to his face” (2:11) and, “before them all” (2:14).  It had to be, and sadly, it is not done in our churches today.  John Stott put it this way:
“It was one thing for the Jerusalem leaders to give their approval to the conversion of the Gentiles, but could they approve of … commitment to the Messiah without inclusion in Judaism? Was their vision big enough to see the gospel of Christ not as a reform movement within Judaism but as good news for the whole world, and the church of Christ … as the international family of God?”

Paul, now, draws a line in the sand.  From 2:15 – 21, he sets for the theological (God ordered) propositions of the Gospel message.  What is the Gospel message?  “... we know that a person is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law, because by works of the law no one will be justified” (2:16).  If we do not have this down, we are in serious trouble.  I say that because a recent report of evangelicals in America demonstrates that over 50% of Christians say they believe their good works are necessary and contribute to their salvation![1]  Paul is consistent in 2:16, with what he was to write in Romans 3:21 – 28.  Those who oppose the Gospel of Grace through Faith in Jesus Christ have devised “other gospels” down through the centuries.  It was a gospel of works that lead Martin Luther to issue 95 Theses to challenge the Catholic Church, and it eventually led to the Reformation.  There are no “other gospels” –  “...we know that a person is not justified by works of the law, but through faith in Jesus Christ, so we also have believed in Christ Jesus, in order to be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the law, because by works of the law no one will be justified” (2:16).

Reading verses 2:17 – 19 can make us turn our head and go “huh”?  Paul is answering a charge that the Gospel he preaches leads people to embrace a sinful lifestyle.  Eugene Peterson’s translation of these verses is helpful for understanding – “Have some of you noticed that we are not yet perfect? (No great surprise, right?) And are you ready to make the accusation that since people like me, who go through Christ in order to get things right with God, aren't perfectly virtuous, Christ must therefore be an accessory to sin? The accusation is frivolous.  If I was ‘trying to be good,’ I would be rebuilding the same old barn that I tore down. I would be acting as a charlatan.  What actually took place is this: I tried keeping rules and working my head off to please God, and it didn't work. So I quit being a ‘law-man’ so that I could be God’s man” (2:17-19).  Does Grace permit us to disobey God?  Never.  Yet, the solution is not in trying to obey the Law to earn Grace – that is reversing the order.  We receive Grace to deal with our inherent sinfulness, and then in receiving Christ’s righteousness, and the gift of the Holy Spirit, we have the ability to obey, and do so, to demonstrate our love for God.

What follows is the “Exchanged Life” – “For through the law, I died to the law so that I might live for God.  I have been crucified with Christ, and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I now live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.  I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!” (2:19-21). At age twenty, I confessed my Sinfulness to Christ Jesus, asking him to forgive me of my sins, and asked him to be my Savior and Lord.  I was crucified with Christ, but I’m not dead; instead, I’m very much alive because Christ Jesus lives in me, and the life I discovered is lived by faith in Christ – day by day.  Jesus loved me, died for me, gave his life for me, and it was all due to God’s Grace.  If it is any other way...works, earning, being good, then Christ died for nothing!

We all experience doubts when it comes to grace, faith, living for Christ.  Peter did too.  Our hypocritical actions are embarrassing to ourselves, and often expose our weaknesses of the flesh.  Living in the Grace of the Gospel is freeing when we realize Jesus died for my Sin – why in the world would I try to hide it inside?  Hypocrisy makes cowards of us, and the truth of the Gospel at work in us humbles us and reminds us, there is only one way to God, and that is through Jesus Christ.  Our greatest need – because we all are sinners – is Justification before God.  That cannot happen by works but only happens through faith in Christ Jesus’ finished work on the cross.  Martin Luther said it like this – “I must hearken to the Gospel, which teacheth me, not what I ought to do (for that is the proper office of the Law), but what Jesus Christ the Son of God hath done for me: to wit, that he suffered and died to deliver me from sin and death.”[2]
The greatest gift is mine, not because I deserve it, but because God gave it to me through His Son.

Peace


[2] Martin Luther, Commentary on the Epistle to the Galatians, page 101.  Lectures he delivered in 1531 (James Clarke, 1953)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hands Full of Parcels

"A Man whose hands are full of parcels can't receive a gift."   - C. S. Lewis Romans 4:13-16 (ESV) 13  For the promise to Abraham and his offspring that he would be heir of the world did not come through the law but through the righteousness of faith. 14  For if it is the adherents of the law who are to be the heirs, faith is null and the promise is void. 15  For the law brings wrath, but where there is no law there is no transgression. 16  That is why it depends on faith, in order that the promise may rest on grace and be guaranteed to all his offspring—not only to the adherent of the law but also to the one who shares the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all... The last four days have been best described by the word "fatigue".  It's not an uncommon word in our vocabulary.  Listless, tired, sore.  1300 miles of car travel, being sick, not sleeping well, and eating poorly all add up to the word - fatigue.   Someone onc...

The Tabernacle

The readings today are Exodus 36, 37, 38 I wanted to post some pictures of what these various parts of the Tabernacle looked like. It's not the easiest read in the world, but if you persevere through it, you can get a picture of all the different pieces that made up the tabernacle. It is a replica of the various parts of the Tabernacle in the Wilderness: First thing in the chapter listed is the outside of the tabernacle which consisted of curtains tied together and put on cross bars through loops. Next at the beginning of 37 is the table and lampstand: Also, the altar of incense: And, the altar for the burnt offering which was in the courtyard: Finally, the courtyard which made it all come together: Hope that helps with what it might have all looked like. Most importantly, this was their "place" of worship they were building. I hope you have a great day of worship. - Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

The difference between defending and explaining

The news of recent has focused the suffering of Christians in the middle east who have been martyred for their faith in Christ at the hands of Islamic Terrorists. Through the centuries many Christians have lost their lives as a result of their faith. For us, who live in America, there is little chance that we would have this happen here - but it's entirely possibly that terrorism will strike out at Christians sometime.  But, for many Christians in the western world - especially here in the U.S. - being a Christians who believes God's word there is a form of persecution that is defined by words like "ostracized", "passed over", "ridiculed", and more. What do we do in the face of opposition to faith? When the Apostle Peter writes to the early believers who are undergoing great pressure, even persecution for their faith in Jesus, he gives them this charge. 1 Peter 3:8-18 8  Finally, all of you, have unity of mind, sympathy, brotherly lov...