Skip to main content

The Trials and Pilate - John 18:28 - 19:16

 Monday, November 16 –

We begin the week in our reading thru the New Testament, and continue to read John’s Gospel.  The beginning of this week’s readings is tragic, but the end of the week is triumphant.  Today, read John 18:28 – 19:16.  After you finish reading, please come back and we’ll look at it together.


John does not follow the Synoptic Gospels in detailing Jesus’ trial before Caiaphas (cf. Matt. 26:57-27:1, Mark 14:53-65; Luke 22:66-71).  The purpose of the Jewish trial was to find Jesus guilty of blasphemy, because he claimed he was equal to God, and as Jesus answered their question with the words, “you say that I Am”, they had all they needed to sentence him to death.  The trial before Caiaphas and the Sanhedrin took place, illegally, before Dawn.  John knows that they could not have executed Jesus if they didn’t have the Romans on their side, so he begins with the Jewish leaders marching Jesus to Pontius Pilate’s headquarters.  It was around six in the morning and Jesus’ “hour” was at hand.

“Then they led Jesus from the house of Caiaphas to the governor’s headquarters. It was early morning. They themselves did not enter the governor’s headquarters, so that they would not be defiled, but could eat the Passover.  So Pilate went outside to them and said, “What accusation do you bring against this man?”  They answered him, “If this man were not doing evil, we would not have delivered him over to you.”  Pilate said to them, “Take him yourselves and judge him by your own law.” The Jews said to him, “It is not lawful for us to put anyone to death.”  This was to fulfill the word that Jesus had spoken to show by what kind of death he was going to die” (18:28-32).

It is so clear that Jesus is in control of all that is happening here.  The Jews led Jesus to Pilate, but in a rather ironic act, they stay outside of Pilate’s headquarters because it is the day before Passover begins and they do not want to defile themselves by entering into a Gentile setting.  They religiously thought they were clean before God by doing this part of the law while ignoring the rest of the law in Jesus’ illegal trial.  Their religion clouds their hearts in darkness, as religion often does.  Pilate wants to know what the charge against Jesus is, but the Jews veil their answer in not making a specific charge, but rather in reasoning that they wouldn’t have brought him if he had not done something worth Pilate’s judgment.  Clearly, Pilate would not be interested in a charge of blasphemy, so they have to make him think Jesus is a revolutionary who is intent on overthrowing the Romans.  As this initial proceeding takes place, John makes the commentary, that each part thinks it is in control, but John knows it is Jesus who is directing this.

The Jewish leaders want the death penalty, so Pilate goes back to question Jesus: “So Pilate entered his headquarters again and called Jesus and said to him, “Are you the King of the Jews?”  Jesus answered, “Do you say this of your own accord, or did others say it to you about me?”  Pilate answered, “Am I a Jew? Your own nation and the chief priests have delivered you over to me. What have you done?”  Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.”  Then Pilate said to him, “So you are a king?” Jesus answered, “You say that I am a king. For this purpose I was born and for this purpose I have come into the world—to bear witness to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth listens to my voice.”  Pilate said to him, “What is truth?” After he had said this, he went back outside to the Jews and told them, “I find no guilt in him” (18:33-38).

Pilate must have looked at Jesus’ bloody, broken body and thought “what did this guy do?”  Yet, when they claim he is a King, he asks the question – “are you the King of the Jews?”  Had Pilate any knowledge of Jesus at this point?  We don’t know.  Perhaps he had heard of Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem that had stirred the crowds who came to lay the Palm branches before him – much like a King would receive as he rode into a city.  Looking at Jesus we see that Pilate didn’t think of Jesus as a threat, but his job was to discern if Jesus was a potential revolutionary.  Jesus’ answer to Pilate is that he is a King, but not of any earthly kingdom.  Kingdoms, governments, nations are founded on power, military might, financial backing, intellectual leadership, and customs derived from the past.  Jesus describes the Kingdom as a place of Truth, and there is no military fight that his rule represents.  The basis of Christ’s Kingdom is the Truth, but Pilate dismissed that as insignificant to Rome’s power.  “What is truth?” is the world’s (even today) of reasoning that “truth is whatever I want to make it to be”.  The Romans, like the West (including America) today, see truth as their intellectual and social superiority.  It is a pragmatic truth that chooses expediency…what works…and not God’s way, truth, life.  Pilate comes to the conclusion that Jesus is no threat and he concludes – “this man is not a threat, he’s not guilty of anything”.  It is here that Pilate proposes another solution, but caves in when they reject it:

“But you have a custom that I should release one man for you at the Passover. So do you want me to release to you the King of the Jews?”  They cried out again, “Not this man, but Barabbas!” Now Barabbas was a robber.  Then Pilate took Jesus and flogged him.  And the soldiers twisted together a crown of thorns and put it on his head and arrayed him in a purple robe.  They came up to him, saying, “Hail, King of the Jews!” and struck him with their hands.  Pilate went out again and said to them, “See, I am bringing him out to you that you may know that I find no guilt in him” (18:39-19:4). 

Pilate had hoped that if he released Jesus – as was his custom at Passover – that He would be done with this issue.  Yet, the Jewish leaders had made it clear to the crowd that Jesus had to be crucified.  Pilate turns Jesus over to his soldiers who mock him, strike him, taunt him – all to humiliate and appease the crowd’s blood-thirsty desire.  It doesn’t work.

“So Jesus came out, wearing the crown of thorns and the purple robe. Pilate said to them, “Behold the man!”  When the chief priests and the officers saw him, they cried out, “Crucify him, crucify him!” Pilate said to them, “Take him yourselves and crucify him, for I find no guilt in him” (19:5-6).

Pilate gave them permission to do execute him, but the Jews didn’t want this decision to rest on them.  They needed Pilate to be the one who ordered Jesus’ execution.  The Jewish leaders tell Pilate about Jesus’ claim to be the Son of God, and that is when Pilate shows that he is now afraid of what was going on and who Jesus really is.

“The Jews answered him, “We have a law, and according to that law he ought to die because he has made himself the Son of God.”  When Pilate heard this statement, he was even more afraid.  He entered his headquarters again and said to Jesus, “Where are you from?” But Jesus gave him no answer.  So Pilate said to him, “You will not speak to me? Do you not know that I have authority to release you and authority to crucify you?”  Jesus answered him, “You would have no authority over me at all unless it had been given you from above. Therefore he who delivered me over to you has the greater sin” (19:7-11).

Pilate is obviously aware of what they were saying – Jesus is equal to God.  He asks, “where are you from?”, but Jesus would not answer him.  Pilate attempts to coerce Jesus with his authority, and once again we clearly see – Pilate has no authority except what God gives him.  Evil cannot prevail against truth, and power belongs to truth, not evil.  Who was Jesus speaking about when he says “he who delivered me over to you has the greater sin?”  Judas?  Caiaphas? Satan? – all of them played a role and none of them acted alone.  Human leaders, rulers, whether by democracy or dictatorship, often lose sight of the truth that their authority is derived from God’s sovereign will.  As Bruce Milne says: “Jesus, however, is conscious of an authority infinitely greater than any wielded by Pilate, or Caesar, or Caiaphas, or the Jewish mob; an authority in whose hands these human forces are but reeds in the wind. His ‘hour’ has come, hence he is now ‘given up’ by the Father to Pilate’s will. Pilate’s mastery is purely a ‘gift’ from above. As to human responsibility, that lies the more with Caiaphas and his cronies, who had been exposed to the light of God’s Word and risen up in evil confederacy to extinguish it (18:11).[1]

Now things move quickly to a mutual Jewish/Roman resolution.  A resolution that was purely political for Pilate, but one that he was forced to agree to.  It was nine o’clock in the morning.

“From then on Pilate sought to release him, but the Jews cried out, “If you release this man, you are not Caesar’s friend. Everyone who makes himself a king opposes Caesar.”  So when Pilate heard these words, he brought Jesus out and sat down on the judgment seat at a place called The Stone Pavement, and in Aramaic Gabbatha.  Now it was the day of Preparation of the Passover. It was about the sixth hour. He said to the Jews, “Behold your King!”  They cried out, “Away with him, away with him, crucify him!” Pilate said to them, “Shall I crucify your King?” The chief priests answered, “We have no king but Caesar.”  So, he delivered him over to them to be crucified” (19:12-16). 

To the Jews – “this man” – is a blasphemer and deserves death.  To Pilate, Jesus is a problem that he needs to get rid of in order to appease both the Jews and the leaders back in Rome.  Behold your King” is not an acknowledgment from Pilate, but rather it is a mocking comment on why Jesus had to die.  To us, this is our Savior, our Lord, who is suffering for us.  He is condemned as Isaiah had prophesied, that He might bear our curse.  The trials are all unfair – an abuse of justice – but all are sovereignly directed according to the will of God.  Chuck Swindoll closes this off so brilliantly:

“In 1920, Robert Frost intrigued us with the opening lines of his classic poem:  ‘Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, And sorry I could not travel both And be one traveler, long I stood…  Pontius Pilate stood at a critical juncture—for him, a choice having eternal impact. He had to decide which kingdom he would serve.  The road we travel forks more than once... Our first choice has to be Christ, but then, each and every day, we must choose which kingdom we will serve.”[2]  


Peace



[1] Bruce Milne, “The Message of John”, The Bible Speaks Today Series, page 271.

[2] Chuck Swindoll, “John: Swindoll's Living Insights Commentary”, Tyndale, page 364

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hands Full of Parcels

"A Man whose hands are full of parcels can't receive a gift."   - C. S. Lewis Romans 4:13-16 (ESV) 13  For the promise to Abraham and his offspring that he would be heir of the world did not come through the law but through the righteousness of faith. 14  For if it is the adherents of the law who are to be the heirs, faith is null and the promise is void. 15  For the law brings wrath, but where there is no law there is no transgression. 16  That is why it depends on faith, in order that the promise may rest on grace and be guaranteed to all his offspring—not only to the adherent of the law but also to the one who shares the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all... The last four days have been best described by the word "fatigue".  It's not an uncommon word in our vocabulary.  Listless, tired, sore.  1300 miles of car travel, being sick, not sleeping well, and eating poorly all add up to the word - fatigue.   Someone onc...

The Tabernacle

The readings today are Exodus 36, 37, 38 I wanted to post some pictures of what these various parts of the Tabernacle looked like. It's not the easiest read in the world, but if you persevere through it, you can get a picture of all the different pieces that made up the tabernacle. It is a replica of the various parts of the Tabernacle in the Wilderness: First thing in the chapter listed is the outside of the tabernacle which consisted of curtains tied together and put on cross bars through loops. Next at the beginning of 37 is the table and lampstand: Also, the altar of incense: And, the altar for the burnt offering which was in the courtyard: Finally, the courtyard which made it all come together: Hope that helps with what it might have all looked like. Most importantly, this was their "place" of worship they were building. I hope you have a great day of worship. - Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

The difference between defending and explaining

The news of recent has focused the suffering of Christians in the middle east who have been martyred for their faith in Christ at the hands of Islamic Terrorists. Through the centuries many Christians have lost their lives as a result of their faith. For us, who live in America, there is little chance that we would have this happen here - but it's entirely possibly that terrorism will strike out at Christians sometime.  But, for many Christians in the western world - especially here in the U.S. - being a Christians who believes God's word there is a form of persecution that is defined by words like "ostracized", "passed over", "ridiculed", and more. What do we do in the face of opposition to faith? When the Apostle Peter writes to the early believers who are undergoing great pressure, even persecution for their faith in Jesus, he gives them this charge. 1 Peter 3:8-18 8  Finally, all of you, have unity of mind, sympathy, brotherly lov...