Today's readings are in Deuteronomy 17 & 18
As this young nation gets ready to enter into the land, two new offices of leadership are recognized for the first time - Kings and Prophets.
They are completely different offices, but both exert leadership and influence on the lives of the people.
The section we're in continues to be an expansion on the theme of the first three commandments that refer to God. Moses will not be going into the land and as leader of the nation he has already given leadership over to Joshua. The law gives rights to humans charged with serious crimes; but individual responsibility is established, nonetheless.
The fact that Moses outlines the responsibilities of a King suggest that God made allowance for that kind of leadership "down the road". It would be several hundred years - after the period of the Judges - before Israel would seek a King. Perhaps the major hesitations have to do with their tribal distinctions as 12 tribes, and the desire to keep those distinctions as a part of their identity. Or perhaps as Moses' instructions made clear, they are very familiar with the dangers of leadership: the amassing of possessions and power that can then be used "over" people to dominate, instead of "under" them to serve. It would be wise for leaders to heed the advice that daily they should read the "book of the law" and heed it's commands and warnings.
The role of the Prophet is also introduced. The Israelites had dealings with prophecy in a negative way back in Numbers 22-25 with Balaam. But, God did not deem the deceptive prophesies to justify getting rid of prophets. In fact, he embraced the idea that after they entered the land a fresh word from God was still needed - even though the law was complete. Prophets in a simple way are charged to and warned, that their prophecies are legitimate but they must be of God.
"If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the lord does not take place or come true, that is a message the lord has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously, so do not be alarmed."
Much of modern Christendom has decided to do away with prophets and prophecy - I'm afraid that it is the effects of a rational system that no longer believes in spirituality and mystery. Then again, in places where prophecy is embraced, Paul's advice from I Thess. 5, also has to be added to this:
"Do not quench the Spirit. Do not treat prophecies with contempt, but test them all; hold on to what is good,"
Why is it so hard to practice that? We must recognize God wants to still share with us - "I will be with you always", Jesus says. So, actively listening for the voice of God through others seems the only thing to do.
Peace
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
As this young nation gets ready to enter into the land, two new offices of leadership are recognized for the first time - Kings and Prophets.
They are completely different offices, but both exert leadership and influence on the lives of the people.
The section we're in continues to be an expansion on the theme of the first three commandments that refer to God. Moses will not be going into the land and as leader of the nation he has already given leadership over to Joshua. The law gives rights to humans charged with serious crimes; but individual responsibility is established, nonetheless.
The fact that Moses outlines the responsibilities of a King suggest that God made allowance for that kind of leadership "down the road". It would be several hundred years - after the period of the Judges - before Israel would seek a King. Perhaps the major hesitations have to do with their tribal distinctions as 12 tribes, and the desire to keep those distinctions as a part of their identity. Or perhaps as Moses' instructions made clear, they are very familiar with the dangers of leadership: the amassing of possessions and power that can then be used "over" people to dominate, instead of "under" them to serve. It would be wise for leaders to heed the advice that daily they should read the "book of the law" and heed it's commands and warnings.
The role of the Prophet is also introduced. The Israelites had dealings with prophecy in a negative way back in Numbers 22-25 with Balaam. But, God did not deem the deceptive prophesies to justify getting rid of prophets. In fact, he embraced the idea that after they entered the land a fresh word from God was still needed - even though the law was complete. Prophets in a simple way are charged to and warned, that their prophecies are legitimate but they must be of God.
"If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the lord does not take place or come true, that is a message the lord has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously, so do not be alarmed."
Much of modern Christendom has decided to do away with prophets and prophecy - I'm afraid that it is the effects of a rational system that no longer believes in spirituality and mystery. Then again, in places where prophecy is embraced, Paul's advice from I Thess. 5, also has to be added to this:
"Do not quench the Spirit. Do not treat prophecies with contempt, but test them all; hold on to what is good,"
Why is it so hard to practice that? We must recognize God wants to still share with us - "I will be with you always", Jesus says. So, actively listening for the voice of God through others seems the only thing to do.
Peace
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Comments
If God can speak through Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, then why not Billy Graham, Chuck Swindoll, or Max Lucado? The fact that the latter of these are not in the Bible doesn't mean they are wrong. But we should test what they say against the Bible. Sometimes people think rational because that is the only thing they know. If I ever start to think rational I will possibly miss a bigger picture God is revealing to me through someone else. The spirit will always keep sharing, but sometimes, I'm afraid we don't listen.